"Travis L Scholten", "bio"=>"Thinking about near-term quantum computing applications.", "avatar"=>"images/profile.jpg", "location"=>"Wherever I happen to be", "github"=>"Travis-S", "instagram"=>"travis_sch", "twitter"=>"Travis_Sch", "youtube"=>"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo1RVaq2aqTJMRZGzQa45WQ", "linkedin"=>"travis-scholten-aa96b4b3/"}"> Inaccuracy in Quantum State Tomography - What is To Be Done? | TLS

Inaccuracy in Quantum State Tomography - What is To Be Done?

Date: 16 October 2015

Location: Tempe, AZ


I gave this talk at the American Physical Society Four Corners Section meeting. Due to the nature of the audience (mostly graduates and undergraduates), I focused on some of the more straightfoward and intuitive ideas about model selection, and touched briefly on how information criteria need to be modified for the kind of state tomography I am studying.


Slide Deck


Quantum state tomography is a set of techniques for estimating quantum states from the statistics of measurement outcomes. State tomography of continuous-variable systems, such as optical modes, is difficult because formally the state space is infinite dimensional. Thus, in order to have an accurate estimate, some “good” dimension must be chosen. This dimension must be identified on the fly, where the data themselves are used to quantify the accuracy of the estimate. Several techniques from classical statistics, collectively known as model selection, provide us with ways of estimating the inaccuracy. One such technique, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), relates inaccuracy to the Hilbert space dimension of the estimate. I will show - surprisingly - that the AIC does not reliably predict the inaccuracy for estimating continuous-variable quantum states, suggesting the AIC is not an appropriate model selection technique for these systems, and that new criteria are needed.